We dream of a better world. A world without Peter Rohde. We are working to create that world. We are:

The foundation for a future without Peter Rohde in it.

Join.

Subscribe.

Unsubscribe.

Complain.

Shop.

The case against Peter Rohde is explained here.
The corrupt institutional powers that enable him are explained here.
quantum optics, quantum cryptography, quantum blockchain, quantum computing, linear optical quantum computing, quantum internet, quantum, physics, quantum physics, research, quantum theory, blockchain, Macquarie University, UQ, BTQ, UTS, ARC future fellow, Australia, Peter Rohde, Zixin Huang, Gavin Brennan, Yuval Sanders Physical Review A Quantum Science and Technology, Physica Scripta, Physical Review Research, ISSS Journal of Micro and Smart Systems

The Charter, Bylaws, Policies and Procedures of The Peter Rohde Hate Group (NLC) and its controlled assets and entities.

Expand All




Charter:
  1. The name and chartered purpose of an organization who's flagship website is "fuckpeterrohde.com" should be manifestly obvious.
Bylaws:
  1. All acts in furtherance of this organizations charter are understood to have been done on the delegated authority of the registrar and not in anyone's individual capacity.
  2. The registrar is defined as an office of authority within the organization which is simultaneously held by all the people responsible for group decisions and activities.
  3. Records of the delegations of authority by the registrar are not kept.
  4. This may all sound like a corrupt trick to offload all legal liability onto a fictitious entity called "the registrar", and it is.
  5. We learned it from Macquarie University.
Fraud and Corruption Prevention Procedure:
  1. If any members activities become the subject of an ICAC inquiry:
    1. they must use the phrase "special statutory power? but I ardly know er" during the hearing.
    2. the next round is on them.
  2. The prior notwithstanding, any member who reports another members activities had a corrupt incentive to do so (namely a free beer) and therefore the next round is on them instead.
  3. This may sound like an inane and stupid anti-corruption procedure, and it is.
  4. But it is still somehow clearer and more effective than the one at Macquarie University.
Privacy Policy:
  1. Information about our privacy policy may be accessed upon request made by signalling an enquiry via semaphore to the privacy officer.
  2. No one knows who the privacy officer is, not even the privacy officer. That's how good they are.
  3. This may seem ridiculous, and it is.
  4. Now try looking up the Privacy officer at Macquarie University.
Doorbell and Doorknob Procedure:
  1. Requests for your personal information which are held by the organization should be made directly via International Code of Signals to the relevant officer, registrar or their delegate.
  2. Upon getting your request, the person holding the data will consult with the privacy officer and compliance mommy.
  3. ????
  4. Personal data!
  5. This procedure may appear purposely hidden by obtuse naming and hopelessly under-defined, and it is.
  6. We got the idea from the Macquarie University Access and Security Procedure lines 11 and 12.
Harassment of a Physical, Sexual or Other Nature Policy:
  1. Harassment is anything that is unwanted. Possibly even ones professional and legal obligations. Even this policy might be harassing to you.
  2. Harassment can be physical, verbal, ethereal, tangible or intangible. It might be manifestly obvious or might only manifest to those with esoteric knowledge.
  3. Anyone might be harassing anyone at any time.
  4. Harassment might even be in the room with you right now.
  5. We are all born guilty of harassment. Repent sinner.
  6. This may seem like an obtuse way to define harassment, and it is.
  7. Compare it with Macquarie University Staff Sexual Harassment Prevention and Response Policy line 14.
Policy Policy:
  1. This policy was made in accordance with this policy.
  2. We don't know the point of this policy either.
  3. This may seem pointless and stupid, and it is.
  4. We got the idea from the Macquarie University Policy Framework Policy.
Breaches of Conduct Code Investigation Procedure:
  1. Allegations about the conduct of members of the Peter Rohde Hate Group (NLC) should be made in writing using our standard complaint form (which you may already be familiar with).
  2. Allegations which lack specificity or evidence given will not be considered.
  3. Allegations of a breach are to be judged by Compliance Mommy.
  4. The standard of evidence is pics or it didn't happen.
  5. Putting this procedure far away from the Code of Conduct and the ordinary Complaint Procedure so that its likely to be overlooked may seem like a disingenuous trick, and it is.
  6. We copied this tactic from Macquarie University.
Reasonable Direction Policy:
  1. The registrar is authorized to make reasonable directions.
  2. A direction is judged to be reasonable if we, the reasonable people who constitute this organization, agree that its reasonable.
  3. Any act by a member which was not explicitly said to have been pursuant to another bylaw is implicitly justified as a "reasonable direction".
  4. The prior line applies even to acts which aren't even instructions.
  5. This policy may seem like arbitrary use of discretionary authority masquerading as rule of law, and it is.
  6. We copied this tactic from Macquarie University.
Drugs and Controlled Substance Policy:
  1. Intoxicating includes stupefying.
  2. Take a guess which university Student Code of Conduct we literally copied this from verbatim.
AI Policy:
  1. I'm sorry, as an online language model it would be unethical for me to assist in drafting the polices, procedures and bylaws of a "no liability conglomeration..."
  2. Take a guess which university's policies inspired this gimmick.
  3. That's right, its UTS.
Controlled Entities Policy:
  1. This organization is fragmented into multiple controlled entities specifically structured in such a way that we can claim it would be too complex and onerous to comply with any subpoena and thus get it set aside.
  2. We have like 5 controlled entities mate. You can’t expect us to know what’s going on in all of them.
  3. This may seem like a terribly constructed excuse to evade compliance with lawful orders, and it is.
  4. We got this idea from Bartier Perry, acting on behalf of Macquarie University
Code of Conduct:
  1. No dicks out in public.
Compliance Policy:
  1. The Peter Rohde Hate Group is a NLC ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Health and Safety Risk Management Policy:
  1. YOLO
Piracy Policy:
  1. Ahoy matey, you best be wantin the Privacy Policy.
Conflict of Interest Policy:
  1. We prefer to think of them as "opportunities of interest".
Diversity and Inclusion Policy:
  1. Everyone is welcome here.
  2. Except Peter Rohde.
  3. Fuck Peter Rohde.
Human Rights Policy:
  1. We respect the rights of all people.
  2. Except Peter Rohde.
  3. Fuck Peter Rohde.
Peter Rohde Policy:
  1. No.
Yuval Sanders Response and Prevention Procedure:
  1. Identify the threat as Yuval Sanders.
  2. Stop giving a shit, its Yuval Sanders.
Complaints Policy:
  1. Complaints about Peter Rohde are allowed and encouraged.
  2. Complaints about people close to Peter Rohde or organizations which employ or support Peter Rohde may also be processed under the Complaints Procedure.
  3. Complaints will be handled with procedural fairness.
  4. The standard of evidence is fuck Peter Rohde.
Complaints Procedure:
  1. Upon getting a complaint about Peter Rohde, the registrar will evaluate:
    1. Possible relevance of evidence to/from other complaints about Peter Rohde.
    2. Possible ways of obtaining more evidence against Peter Rohde, such as:
      1. Legal processes including GIPA or subpoena.
      2. Publicly searchable information such as twitter or linkedin.
  2. The Registrar will then act to resolve the complaint. The ways to resolve a complaint about Peter Rohde may include (but are not limited to):
    1. Assisting the complainant in legal processes, such as:
      1. Helping them prepare their materials in an affidavit.
      2. Helping them write a subpoena and getting it approved.
      3. Offering to provide testimony against Peter Rohde.
    2. Identifying relevant regulatory or government bodies to report Peter Rohde to, such as:
      1. The Ombudsman.
      2. ICAC.
      3. The police.
      4. The courts (via civil or criminal private prosecution).
    3. Assisting and reviewing reports about Peter Rohde intended for regulators or government bodies.
    4. Sharing information with the complainant from elsewhere which might be useful against Peter Rohde.
    5. Publishing or disclosing the complainants information about Peter Rohde via the groups official channels (while protecting their identity). This may involve:
      1. Publicly announced such as via a mailing list.
      2. Publicly disclosed such as via twitter or published on the group website.
      3. A private disclosure such as an email to Peter Rohde's employer or professionally important contacts.
      4. A private disclosure to Peter Rohde, so he knows we know.
  3. The Registrar reserves the ability to:
    1. Request assistance from anyone they deem proper.
    2. Delegate the resolution to anyone else.
    3. Use extra-legal means if justified by the ends.
  4. If at this stage the complainant is still unsatisfied, they may appeal by challenging the registrar to a duel.
  5. In such cases the standard of evidence shall be to the death.
  6. However, before deciding to accept the appeal, the registrar must consult:
    1. the Compliance Policy
    2. the Health and Safety Risk Management Policy
  7. The registrar may also refuse the appeal if they are satisfied that it is vexatious or if the complainants conduct is quarrelsome or disruptive.
  8. If the duel is accepted then at this stage the registrar must:
    1. Choose the weapons.
    2. Affix a time and date.
    3. Pick a place to die where its dry and high.
  9. Both parties to the duel shall have the right to a support person (known as "seconds") subject to the conditions that:
    1. Seconds must not be a practising solicitor.
    2. Seconds are required to attempt informal complaint resolution one last time prior to the commencement of proceedings.
  10. Fire!

Other governance matters

Organisational hirearchy
Statement of attitude towards corruption






Annual Disclosure
2023: But I 'ardly know 'er.
2024: I still 'ardly know 'er.

Financial snapshot





le rohde morte quantum optics The Peter Rohde Hate Group (NLC) quantum computing fuck Peter Rohde (and Zixin Huang, Yuval Sanders and Gavin Brennan) Foundation for a Future quantum internet without Peter Rohde The Rohde Rope Research Foundation into Linear Optical Quantum Computing The Independent Commission Against Peter Rohde blockchain The Itty Bitty Titty Committee Against Corruption. Improving continuous-variable quantum channels with unitary averaging Radio Free Rohde (Australia) The Rohde to Perdition is paved with intention. Macquarie University, UTS, BTQ. Physical Review A Quantum Science and Technology Physical Review A Physical Review A Physica Scripta Physical Review Research Upper bounds for the clock speeds of fault-tolerant distributed quantum computation using satellites to supply entangled photon pairs

Disclaimer: I 'ardly know 'er. Part of The Peter Rohde Hate Group (NLC).
Fuck Peter Rohde .